The Physics of Anti-Gravity

To discuss this video in detail, post links and more, please visit the AlienScientist Discussion Forums: www.alienscientist.com Richard Feynman once said "It doesn't matter how smart you are, or how brilliant your theory is. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's WRONG!" I'd really like to see if this theory is wrong, but I don't think it is. At least until someone can show me how and why it fails. So far it's only given right answers. You get the Compton wave of the electron, the radii and intensities of spectral emissions, and it explains why everything looked so confusing through the only lenses which 1930s science permitted. The mathematical achievements of the past century are astounding in retrospect to such a simplified theory of quantum mechanics. Yet the math gives us real answers, and tells us these abstract hyperdimensional modelings was just the speed of light refracting into the electron shell which behaves like a Bose Condensate. The first Bose Condensate wasn't created until 2003, the great scientists never performed experiments with large diameter rotating superconductors, so how could they possibly have known or seen this??? The Original Paper: www.scribd.com A-reconciliation-of-Quantum-Mechanics-and-Special-Relativity: www.scribd.com Frank Znidarsic "The Duality of Matter and Waves": www.scribd.com Background and additional info: en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org Schrodinger and Dirac Equations: en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org Bose-Einstein <b>...</b>
Gravity Quantum Mechanics Theory Physics Antigravity Science NASA propulsion Znidarsic UFO Alien Technology Anti gravito electrogravity gravitomagnetism warp drive tech real space travel












































