
This Superintendent like his predecessors, in the complaints department, would instead of properly investigating the misconduct reported to them, sooner Whittle about what the victims are publishing. In fact Whittle is the head of the Professional Standards Department (Double Standards) Like his predecessors in the old complaints department, they do not like complaints made against fellow officers who they have served with. It is like asking Ronald Cray to investigate Reggie, especially where there is a conflict of interest, it is unethical in the way they deal with the allegations. If you complain to the IPCC about the manner in which Whittle and his department have covered up or dismissed a misconduct allegation, it is given to Whittle and his department to investigate the allegation against themselves. We are not saying that sending allegations against Senior ACPO Officers, the Clerk to the Police Authority, or the Head of the Complaints Department, to an outside force will give an un biased pragmatic investigation. It would however be more ethical, and when the statute law under the old PACE act stated they had to do this, this force and the clerk to the police authority obstructed the powers granted by statute law, stating that those allegations should have gone to an outside force, but were in fact covered up. --- DISCLAIMER! ---- §107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted <b>...</b>
dorset
police
martin
baker
inspector
meteau
masonic
constables
common
law
psychodrilla